Save These Dates!
PHFA Issues Draft 2017/2018 Qualified Allocation Plan

Recent FASB Release Affecting General Partners In A Limited Partnership

FASBIn January 2017, the Financial Standards Accounting Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2017-02, Clarifying When a Not-for-Profit Entity That Is a General Partner or a Limited Partner Should Consolidate a For-Profit Limited Partnership or Similar Entity.

ASUs released in 2015 regarding consolidations created uncertainty about when a not-for-profit entity (NFP) that is a general partner should consolidate a for-profit partnership or similar legal entity. (An example of a similar legal entity would be a limited liability company where the managing member is the functional equivalent of the general partner.) With the release of ASU 2017-02, the FASB eliminates diversity in practice and provides clear consolidation guidance to the parties involved. NFP general partners are now able to refer directly to the Not-For-Profit Entities section of the Codification (Subtopic 958-810) for consolidation guidance.

Under current guidance, NFP general partners are presumed to control a for-profit partnership, regardless of their ownership interest, unless that presumption is overcome. If the presumed control is not overcome, the NFP general partner is required to consolidate the for-profit limited partnership. The presumption is overcome if the limited partner has either substantive kick-out rights or substantive participating rights. If applicable, kick-out rights and substantive participating rights are typically described in the limited partnership agreement (or operating agreements for limited liability companies).

The substantive kick-out right is the ability of the limited partner to dissolve the limited partnership or otherwise remove the general partner without cause by a simple majority vote, and that vote is accomplished with no significant barriers.

Examples of substantive participating rights include the following: (1) selecting, terminating, and setting the compensation of management responsible for implementing the limited partnership’s policies and procedures; and (2) establishing operating and capital decisions of the limited partnership, including budgets, in the ordinary course of business.

The release of ASU 2017-02 did not change the general guidance surrounding presumption of control and what is needed to overcome that presumption.
ASU No. 2017-02 is effective for NFPs for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. NFPs that have adopted ASU 2015-02 are required to adopt the amendments of ASU 2017-02 retrospectively to all relevant periods, beginning with the fiscal year in which ASU 2015-02 was initially applied.

For more details on this topic, visit McKonly & Asbury News.

If you have any questions regarding ASU 2017-02 and its applicability to your organization, please contact Jim Shellenberger at jshellenberger@macpas.com, Dan Kern at dkern@macpas.com or our Affordable Housing Team at affordablehousing@macpas.com.

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Your Information

(Name and email address are required. Email address will not be displayed with the comment.)